myEarthLink
News

Weather  

 

The Weather Channel
Cloudy
55° F
New York, NY
Cloudy
Hi: 48° / Lo: 45°

Sports   edit

nhl - Scoreboard [hide]

Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Final
Thursday, February 22, 2018
Minnesota Wild (32-20-7) at
Preview
No Games Scheduled

nba - Scoreboard [hide]

Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Final
No Games Scheduled
Friday, February 23, 2018
Preview

nfl - Scoreboard [hide]

No Games Scheduled
No Games Scheduled
No Games Scheduled

mlb - Scoreboard [hide]

Saturday, October 21, 2017
New York Yankees (91-71) at
Final
No Games Scheduled
Friday, February 23, 2018
Preview

Market Update  

- By Maria LaMagna Consumers are putting saving on the back burner Some Americans' finances are on very thin ice. One in five Americans say they have more credit-card debt than they do in e...
More

MarketWatch

 
Sign In to get personalized news, weather and more at myEarthLink.
 

Printable View

Experts: What states can do to secure their elections
FILE- In this Oct. 14, 2016, file photo, a technician works to prepare voting machines to be used in the upcoming presidential election, in Philadelphia. Since last July, a bipartisan team at Harvard, including former U.S. Marine and Army cyberwarriors, national security eggheads and Google engineers, has been looking into how to safeguard the vote against interference. The group drafted its latest protect-the-vote election “playbooks” intended to prepare state and local officials for the worst. (AP Photo - Matt Rourke)
By the Associated Press
From Associated Press
February 13, 2018 11:51 AM EST

Newly released "playbooks" from a bipartisan team at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government aims to help state and local elections officials protect against hacking and disinformation.

Here are the group's key findings and recommendations.

KEY FINDINGS

— Elections officials generally lack the resources to secure their operations, especially in smaller counties. Many can't even afford such vital security measures as two-factor authentication, which helps protect networks by requiring users to verify their identity twice, usually with codes texted to their phones, when logging in.

— Voting equipment vendors, which play an outsized role in elections because local poll workers often have limited tech skills, can be easy, valuable targets. More than 60 percent of U.S. voters cast ballots on systems owned and operated by a single company. Hostile infiltration of one vendor could affect many elections.

— Don't just worry about the Russians. Insiders and people seeking political gain or notoriety also pose potential election-manipulation threats.

RECOMMENDATIONS

— Institute background checks for everyone with access to sensitive elections information and privileged systems. This includes voter registration databases and vote tabulation and reporting systems. Employees of voting-equipment vendors should also be cleared this way.

— Voting systems should have a paper trail — a physical copy of every ballot cast. Without one, it's impossible to "audit" elections after the fact to detect possible tampering. Five states continue to rely wholly on digital-only voting machines that leave no paper trail.

— Audits should be standard, with paper records confirming electronic results. Currently, the only states requiring the rigorous audits recommended by voting technology experts are Colorado and Rhode Island.

— Officials should be transparent about any election threats and immediately explain to the public what they are doing about them. This doesn't come naturally to organizations that typically shun the spotlight.

___

Online: https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/state-and-local-election-cybersecurity-playbook

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.